California Application Requirements (ORLP)

California Application Requirements (ORLP)

The words in ALL CAPS are defined terms that appear at the bottom of this webpage.

The Submittable online application will require the following information:

Eligibility Requirements

  1. Eligible APPLICANTS

Eligible APPLICANTS include:

  • Cities and counties
  • Federally recognized Native American tribes
  • JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY (JPA) where all members are public agencies. A JPA can include a state agency if at least one member is a local (non-state) public agency or district, and the JPA was formed for the purpose of providing PARK and recreation areas.
  • Non-state agency recreation and PARK districts and special districts with authority to acquire, operate, and maintain public PARK and recreation areas.
  • Eligible State Agencies: DPR, Department of Fish and Wildlife/Wildlife Conservation Board, Department of Water Resources, and The State Coastal Conservancy.
  1. PROJECTS must be located in a 2020 census tract or incorporated city or town with at least 25,000 people.

The Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership (ORLP) Program improves PARKS and recreation opportunities in urban underserved communities. To enable California’s ORLP Review Team to assess if the PROJECT is in a designated census tract, incorporated city or town with a population of at least 25,000 RESIDENTS, APPLICANTS will provide the PROJECT SITE address. If the site does not have a street address, use the latitude and longitude of the PROJECT SITE found in Google Maps.

The PROJECT is in a 2020 designated census tract or incorporated city or town of at least 25,000 people or on a Federal Recognized Tribes land with any population = Eligible

The PROJECT is in a 2020 designated census tract or incorporated city or town with less than 25,000 people = Ineligible

3. PROJECTS must be located within a DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY (census tract).

*Note: Recent updates have been made to this Eligibility Requirement. Previous eligibility documentation generated through the CEJST and EJScreen Tools will still be accepted as eligibility documentation, however both of these reports are no longer available. A new eligibility documentation method can be referenced below.

 

PROJECTS must be located in a Census tract that is determined to be disadvantaged by using at least one of the following methods:

A) Communities identified by the CalEPA's SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities tool. = Eligible

  • Insert the PROJECT SITE address, or Latitude/Longitude in the top left-hand corner of the map.
  • Zoom out, and click on the census tract that includes the project site.
  • Click on the Screenshot Capture Tool in the top right-hand corner.

Screenshot of CALEPA's Map tool with the search open and an address entered

  • Make sure "Pop-up" is checked and click "Set the map Area".

Screenshot of CALEPA tool with the Capture An Image option open and Pop Up checked

  • Draw a box on the map that includes the project site.
  • A Screenshot with the Census Tract Number and Disadvantaged Community Status should populate. Click download image. (See sample screenshot below.)

creenshot of a CAL EPA's tool showing a map with but a small portion shaded red indicating that the red zone is classified as a disadvantaged community. On the left, census data for this particular census tract shows.

 

B) Communities identified as disadvantaged or severely disadvantaged by the Statewide Parks Program Community FactFinder Tool = Eligible

  • Insert the PROJECT SITE address, or Latitude/Longitude in report search bar
  • Click “Report” Button
  • Activate the disadvantaged community layer on the map (visual reference below)

 

Screenshot of FactFinder Report map standard on left and with the disadvantaged community layer activated on the right

  • Ensure the pin is within the boundary of the park
  • If any portion of the half-mile circle radius around your PROJECT SITE includes a disadvantaged or severely disadvantaged community the project will qualify.
  • Upload the XLSX Report to the Submittable Application. Be sure to include the Project ID number in the Submittable fillable field for Project ID. (Visual reference below)

Screenshot of FactFinder report displaying census data with the project ID in the top left outlined with a bold red box

C) If neither tool identifies the community as disadvantaged, submit verifiable documentation with sources such as reports describing the demographic and environmental factors that indicate the community’s status of need.

D) If neither tool identifies the community as disadvantaged and there is no documentation describing the demographic and environmental factors that indicate the community’s status of need = Ineligible

4. COMMITTED FUNDS and Reimbursement Process

ORLP is a reimbursement only program and requires the APPLICANT to cash flow 100% of the TOTAL PROJECT COSTS, with the understanding that ORLP can reimburse up to 50% of the TOTAL PROJECT COST. For example, for a $30 million PROJECT where the APPLICANT is seeking $15 million reimbursement in ORLP GRANT funding, the APPLICANT must certify they have the COMMITTED FUNDS to complete the $30 million PROJECT. See below for more information.

All non-federal (state, local, or private) sources are eligible for MATCH.

Federal sources eligible as MATCH for this program are Community Development Block GRANTS (CDBG), Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act funding, and Readiness and Environmental Protection Integration Program (REPI) funding. Other sources of federal funding are not eligible.

For purpose of this proposal, “committed” means the money is already secured.

The APPLICANT will list each funding source and provide the dollar amount of that source.

  • Reimbursable Cash Flow Source: This amount needs to equal the ORLP GRANT request amount for up to 50% of the TOTAL PROJECT COST. This is the funding that will be used to cashflow the ORLP GRANT amount until an ORLP reimbursement is processed. For example, general funds of the agency may be identified to cash flow the ORLP GRANT amount until a reimbursement is paid.
  • MATCH Source: Funding source(s) proposed for MATCH must be committed and must total at least 50% of the TOTAL PROJECT COST. APPLICANTS may only list COMMITTED FUNDS. For purpose of this proposal, “committed” means the money is already secured. The total amount of "committed" funds for MATCH must equal at least 50% of the TOTAL PROJECT COST.

The APPLICANT listed and certified state, local, private, or eligible federal funding MATCH sources that equal the TOTAL PROJECT COST, with the understanding that ORLP can reimburse up to 50% of the TOTAL PROJECT COST = Eligible

COMMITTED FUNDS are not available or more fundraising will be needed = Ineligible

5. Timeline Confirmation

The APPLICANT will certify an understanding of the state and national competitive review timeline for this federal GRANT program. This program requires states to receive and review applications before the applications may be forwarded to NPS for entry into the national competition.

6. Confirmation of Land Ownership for Public Outdoor Recreation in PERPETUITY

The APPLICANT will certify it owns or will own the PROJECT property and agrees it will remain as a PARK for the public’s benefit in PERPETUITY. This federal program is subject to Title 54 U.S.C. 200.305.f.3. of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act, which provides LWCF PROTECTION to set aside land for public recreational benefits.

The entire PARK will be placed under federal protection for outdoor recreational use in PERPETUITY should the GRANT be awarded by NPS. This means the site, if funded, shall be owned by the GRANTEE, and remain for outdoor recreation use in PERPETUITY.

PROJECT Selection Criteria

The PROJECT Selection Criteria are used to rank all statewide APPLICATIONS.

  • All competing APPLICATIONS start with 0 points.
  • Points are gained through the PROJECT Selection Criteria.
  • Technical assistance for each criteria is listed after Criteria 8
  • If you have questions, contact the NPS Grants PROJECT OFFICER assigned to your County

PROJECT Selection Criteria

  1. Type of PROJECT = 10 Points
  2. NEW RECREATION FEATURES = 20 Points
  3. Environmental DESIGN = 15 Points
  4. STATEWIDE COMPREHENSIVE OUTDOOR RECREATION PLAN (SCORP) = 6 Points
  5. Community Based Planning = 23 Points
  6. Partnerships = 6 Points
  7. CEQA Bonus Points = 5 Points
  8. Community CHALLENGES and PROJECT Benefits = 20 Points

PROJECT Summary (500-word limit – not scored)

APPLICANTS will provide a brief summary of the proposed PROJECT deliverables. If the PROJECT is land ACQUISITION only, the summary and criteria responses below must include a description of the proposed DEVELOPMENT that would take place within 3 years after the ORLP ACQUISITION PROJECT is complete.

Criteria 1 – Type of PROJECT

Criteria 1 evaluates how a PROJECT creates new impactful outdoor RECREATION FEATURES. The national priority for this program is to create NEW PARKS, or to create new outdoor RECREATION FEATURES that are not available in an existing PARK.

1. Type of PROJECT

APPLICANTS will identify which of the following categories is applicable to their PROJECT.

“NEW PARK”: the PROJECT SITE has not been a public PARK in the past, and if the GRANT is awarded, the PROJECT will acquire land for or develop a new public PARK where one currently does not exist.

“EXPAND Existing PARK”: the PROJECT includes adding acreage to increase the official boundaries of an existing PARK. The PROJECT may also include improvements within the existing PARK boundary.

“Improve PARK / No Expansion”: the PROJECT will take place within the existing PARK boundary and does not involve adding acreage to increase the size of the PARK boundary.

Points for 1. – Type of PARK:

  • NEW PARK = 10 points
  • EXPAND Existing PARK = 7 points
  • Improve Existing PARK/No Expansion = 5 points
  • The PROJECT will not create, EXPAND, or improve a PARK = Ineligible

Criteria 2 - New Outdoor RECREATION FEATURES

While RENOVATIONS of existing features can be part of the PROJECT, the purpose of this section is to check what new outdoor RECREATION FEATURES are proposed, as this will make the PROJECT more competitive for the National Review Committee.

NEW RECREATION FEATURES are features that do not currently exist or a substantial RENOVATION of an existing RECREATION FEATURE to allow for new and EXPANDED use(s).

 The NEW RECREATION FEATURE(s) must be outdoors.

PROJECTS that create multiple NEW RECREATION FEATURES to significantly increase the number of people or user groups that may be served will be most competitive. RENOVATION PROJECTS that appear to be a facelift of only replacing existing RECREATION FEATURES will not score as high in the national competition.  

A sample list of RECREATION FEATURES and MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITIES are listed in the technical assistance below.

Points for 2. - New Outdoor RECREATION FEATURES:

  • Four or more New Outdoor RECREATION FEATURES are proposed = 20 points
  • Three New Outdoor RECREATION FEATURES are proposed = 15 points
  • Two New Outdoor RECREATION FEATURES are proposed = 10 points
  • One New Outdoor RECREATION FEATURES is proposed = 5 points
  • The PROJECT only involves RENOVATION of existing features = 0 points

Criteria 3 - Environmental DESIGN

In this section APPLICANTS will describe what environmental or ecological measures the PROJECT includes to mitigate the impacts of future natural disasters and enhance resilience for the community it serves to obtain up to 15 points.

How will the PROJECT include the following sustainable techniques? For the APPLICATION to be competitive, the PROJECT should include:

  • Stormwater: Incorporate pervious surfaces or other technique(s) such as bioswales or grading to capture storm water for infiltration or irrigation, or cleanse storm water before release.
  • Water Efficiency: Use of water efficient irrigation system that includes a rain sensor, evapotranspiration (ET) controllers, flow sensors, or on-site water recycling that reduces potable water consumption, or the PROJECT will not require additional use of water.
  • Carbon sequestration tree planting: Identify approximately how many trees will be planted
  • Landscaping: Landscaping that excludes the use of invasive plants and instead features drought tolerant or climate appropriate non-invasive native turf, trees, shrubs, plants, and ground cover. If applicable, discuss how the landscaping minimizes the use of toxic pesticides and inorganic fertilizers. 

Points for 3. – Environmental DESIGN

  • The PROJECT will include four of the listed techniques. = 15 points
  • The PROJECT will include three of the listed techniques. = 10 points
  • The PROJECT will include one or two of the listed techniques. = 5 points
  • The PROJECT will include none of the listed techniques. = 0 points

Criteria 4 – STATEWIDE COMPREHENSIVE OUTDOOR RECREATION PLAN (SCORP) Priorities

APPLICANTS will describe how the PROJECT meets the SCORP priorities. To be eligible, the PROJECT must meet at least one of these priorities. PROJECTS that meet multiple priorities will be more competitive. Consider this guidance:

  1. NEW PARK Access – The response should describe how the PROJECT will qualify as a “NEW PARK” or “EXPAND an existing PARK.”
  2. Preservation – The response should describe whether funding by the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) was previously GRANTED for part or all of the PROJECT SITE.
  3. Multi-Use PARKS for All Ages – The response should describe how the PROJECT will be DESIGNED to address one or more of the following:
    • DESIGNED to bring families together by supporting art and music, sports, and multi-generational activities.
    • Supports different active and passive recreation interests of all ages.
    • Incorporate PROJECT DESIGN ideas from all age groups
  4. Health DESIGN Goals – The response should describe how this PROJECT results from asking community members for their PARK DESIGN ideas for public health.
  5. Safety and Beautification – The response should describe the how this PROJECT includes enhancements for:
    • Safe public use such as lighting, netting, strategic location of features, etc.
    • Beautification, such as landscaping to make the PARK more welcoming

     

 

 

Points for 4. - MEETING 2021-2025 SCORP Priorities:

  • One or more SCORP Priority will be met between the PROJECT elements = 6 points
  • No SCORP Priority will be met = 0 points and will not be recommended for funding

Criteria 5 – Community Based Planning

Describe how the APPLICANT or partnering community-based organization(s) made efforts, to engage RESIDENTS to DESIGN the PARK.

Use Part A and B to detail the MEETING location schedule and outreach.

Use the three DESIGN goals in Part C to gather RESIDENTS’ ideas at the MEETINGS.

Part C encourages PROJECT enhancements that reflect the RESIDENTS’ unique needs and creativity. The national review committee will give preference to PROJECTS that incorporate the distinctive character of a community and its unique contexts into the PROJECT DESIGN.  Photos of MEETINGS are preferred.

Community Based Planning Part A

How many MEETINGS occurred, in the DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY? Describe why the MEETING locations and times were convenient for RESIDENTS with various schedules.

Use the response template below to list the details of each meeting that occurred in the disadvantaged community.

  1. Meeting Date/Year:
  2. Meeting Type:
  3. Venue name and address:
  4. Start and End Times (am/pm):
  5. Day of Week:
  6. Convenience: (Why was this an effective location and time to engage residents near the project?)
  • List the meetings in order.

Points for community-based planning Part A:

  • The APPLICANT or partners facilitated at least 3 MEETINGS to obtain ideas from the RESIDENTS. The MEETINGS were located within the DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY. At least two of the MEETINGS occurred on a weekend or in the evening. = 8 Points
  • One or two MEETINGS were located within the DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY. One of the MEETINGS occurred on a weekend or in the evening. = 4 Points.
  • MEETINGS were not located within the DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY. Or none of the MEETINGS occurred during a weekend or an evening. = 0 Points

Community Based Planning Part B

For each MEETING listed in the response to Community Based Planning Part A, what method(s) did the APPLICANT or partnering community-based organization(s) use to invite RESIDENTS? In the combined set of MEETINGS, was there a BROAD REPRESENTATION of RESIDENTS?

Structure the response using the template below to describe the method of invitation. Include the number and general description of the residents who participated in each meeting.

*Meetings must be listed in the same order as Criteria 5A - Community Based Planning - Meeting Details.

  1. Invite Method: (Describe how residents were invited to this meeting)
  2. Number of residents: (How many residents attended in person? How many attended online?)
  3. Describe who attended: (Youth, Families, Seniors, Adults, etc.)

Points for Community Based Planning Part B:

  • For the combined set of MEETINGS, at least three methods were used to invite a BROAD REPRESENTATION of RESIDENTS. The number and general description of the RESIDENTS who participated in the combined set of MEETINGS consisted of a BROAD REPRESENTATION of the DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY. = 5 Points
  • For the combined set of MEETINGS, two methods were used to invite a BROAD REPRESENTATION of RESIDENTS. The number and general description of the RESIDENTS who participated in the combined set of MEETINGS consisted of a BROAD REPRESENTATION of the DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY. = 3 Points
  • For the combined set of MEETINGS, one method was used to invite a BROAD REPRESENTATION of RESIDENTS. The number and general description of the RESIDENTS who participated in the combined set of MEETINGS consisted of a BROAD REPRESENTATION of the DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY. = 1 Point
  • The number and general description of the RESIDENTS who participated in the combined set of MEETINGS did not consist of a BROAD REPRESENTATION of the DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY. Or only an advocacy group or league likely to promote a specific type of PROJECT was involved. Or no RESIDENTS were invited, or MEETINGS did not occur. = 0 Points

Community Based Planning Part C

During the MEETINGS that occurred in the DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY, how were the RESIDENTS enabled to DESIGN the PARK using Goals 1-2?

Structure the response by providing the “Process” descriptions and “List” of ideas for the goals shown below.

GOAL 1 The RESIDENTS engaged in a process to reach a general agreement on the selection of the RECREATION FEATURE(S) and DESIGN ELEMENTS for those RECREATION FEATURE(S).

Process to Select the RECREATION FEATURES

  • Describe the process used to enable RESIDENTS to identify, prioritize, and then select, RECREATION FEATURE(S), DESIGN ELEMENTS and sense of place for the proposed PROJECT. The goal is to ask RESIDENTS what they want in the PARK.

List of RECREATION FEATURE(s) DESIGN ELEMENTS 

  • List the RESIDENTS’ ideas that will be included in the detailed DESIGN of the RECREATION FEATURE(S). Avoid listing ideas that will not be part of this PROJECT paid with GRANT funds plus MATCH.
  • DESIGN elements should not be limited to a few predetermined options presented by the APPLICANT to the RESIDENTS at the MEETING. RESIDENTS should be given a blank slate as a starting point in DESIGNING the PARK.

Goal 1 Points – Selection of the RECREATION FEATURE(S) and DESIGN Elements

A maximum of 3 points can be scored for this criterion

  • The RESIDENTS identified their preferred RECREATION FEATURE(S) (not limited to a few predetermined options presented by the APPLICANT). Then, the RESIDENTS selected RECREATION FEATURES for the proposed PROJECT = 3 Points
  • The RESIDENTS provided ideas for DESIGN ELEMENTS for the selected RECREATION FEATURE(S) that will be implemented for this PROJECT. = 2 Points
  • The APPLICANT’S response does not address any of the elements of Goal 1. = 0 Points

GOAL 2 ORLP PROJECTS should promote, protect, and incorporate the distinctive character of a community and its unique contexts. Geography, natural features, climate, culture, historical resources, and ecology each contribute to the distinctive character of a community’s sense of place, comfort, and belonging.

How does the proposed PROJECT enhance and strengthen the sense of place for the underserved community it is intended to serve?

  • New PROJECTS can foster a sense of place when they symbolize hope, and they are familiar. Share how your PROJECT symbolizes hope and provides familiarity with the communities it is intended to serve.
  • Share some instances of creative placemaking that actively involved the community they are DESIGNED for.

o   Creative placemaking uses art and culture to rejuvenate public spaces to build strong, vibrant communities. Standalone artwork may not score well, but artwork clearly integrated into interactive PARK features, overall theme, and playscape is likely to score higher in the national competition.

  • List the reasons for the sense of place DESIGNS that will be included. Avoid listing reasons that will not be used.

Goal 2 Points -Distinctive character DESIGNS that will be included within the PARK.

  • The PROJECT will include distinctive DESIGN ideas from RESIDENTS that creates a sense of place. = 5 Points
  • The APPLICANT’S response does not address any of the elements of Goal 2. = 0 Points

Criteria 6 – Partnerships

The purpose of this section is to highlight public-private partnerships to leverage PROJECT support for this PROJECT. Past successful outdoor recreation PROJECTS include partnerships among public and private sectors, multiple levels of government, private/non-profit organizations, and community groups.

  • What is the name and the general purpose of the partner’s organization/agency?
  • What is the partnership role specific to this PROJECT? Provide a brief summary of the role.

Points for 6 - Partnerships

The PROJECT involves three or more partners providing volunteer hours, materials, or funding for DESIGN, preconstruction, land ACQUISITION, or construction. = 6 points

The PROJECT involves two partners providing volunteer hours, materials, or funding for DESIGN, preconstruction, land ACQUISITION, or construction. = 3 points

The PROJECT involves one partner providing volunteer hours, materials, or funding for DESIGN, preconstruction, land ACQUISITION, or construction. = 1 points

The PROJECT involves no partners. = 0 points

Criteria 7 – CEQA

  • PROJECTS that are selected by NPS for funding, will have 1-year to complete all POST-SELECTION FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. These include environmental and cultural requirements, which can be very time consuming.  Completing these requirements before being selected is not required, however PROJECTS that have completed CEQA will receive bonus points.
  • Completed CEQA includes submitting one of the following:

o       A Notice of Exemption filed with, and stamped by, the county clerk, OR 

o       An Initial Study with a Negative Declaration and a copy of the Notice of Determination filed with, and stamped by, the county clerk, OR 

o       An Initial Study and an Environmental Impact Report and a copy of the Notice of Determination filed with, and stamped by, the county clerk.

  • Additionally, submit a State Clearinghouse Filing Receipt showing that CEQA was filed. For more information on filing with the State Clearinghouse, see www.opr.ca.gov and follow links for CEQA.  

Points for 7 – CEQA

  • CEQA complete at time of application. = 5 Bonus Points

Criteria 8 – Community CHALLENGES and PROJECT Benefits (1,000 words or less)

  • Provide information on current deficiency of access by the affected community to PARKs, conservation areas, and outdoor recreation opportunities.
  • Describe the deficiencies that impact the community in relevant ways:

o   Community health and safety

o   Resilience to natural disasters

o   Avoidance of legacy pollution

o   Access to clean water and air

o   Others as applicable

  • Describe how the PROJECT will provide community benefits.

Points for 8 – Community CHALLENGES and PROJECT Benefits

OGALS will use information in the entire application to assess the community CHALLENGES and PROJECT benefits compared to all applications submitted statewide.

  • The community has high CHALLENGES compared to other applications and the PROJECT will significantly improve the community’s recreation opportunities compared to applications statewide. = 10 – 20 points
  • The community has average CHALLENGES compared to other applications and the PROJECT will create average benefits for the community compared to applications statewide. = 4-9 points
  • The community has minimal CHALLENGES compared to other applications and the PROJECT will minimally improve the community recreation opportunities compared to applications statewide. = 1-3 points

The total maximum number of points for all Criteria is 100 points. Plus 5 bonus points for having CEQA complete at time of application.

This concludes the scored criteria for this program.

Required Application Attachment: Site Plan

Provide a legible drawing showing where the RECREATION FEATURES and MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITIES will be located in the PARK. This does not need to be an architectural rendering it can be a simple drawing.

  • Identify only the RECREATION FEATURES and MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITIES that are being proposed for this GRANT plus MATCH only. Differentiate or shade out any pre-existing or future phase items that will not be part of the PROJECT proposal.
  • Provide a legend/key to visually explain all symbols used on the CONCEPT LEVEL SITE PLAN. Include a north arrow and street names along the PROJECT SITE.

Optional Photo Uploads

  • Project Site Photos: Provide high quality JPEG (5MB or larger) photos of the project site. Include captions to orient the reviewer. These photos may be used for potential “before and after” photos.
  • Meeting Photos (Community Engagement/Park Planning Meetings): Provide high quality JPEG (5MB or larger) photos that show residents engaged in park planning/design.

 

 

Technical Assistance

Criteria 1 – Type of PROJECT

NEW PARKS

  • Qualifies as a NEW PARK: Land zoned or designated to become a PARK, but not yet developed and open to the public prior to the current round APPLICATION due date.
  • Does not qualify as a NEW PARK: Land developed and open to the public as a PARK.
  • In built-out communities, a NEW PARK can be created by acquiring and demolishing a blighted building or a street can be vacated and permanently redeveloped into a PARK.

EXPAND EXISTING PARKS

  • To EXPAND an EXISTING PARK, the PROJECT will acquire or develop land that is currently not part of the ADJACENT EXISTING PARK boundary. This includes adding new acreage of PARK SPACE that is easily accessible next to or across the street from an EXISTING PARK.
  • If a PROJECT will EXPAND an EXISTING PARK, the APPLICANT has the option but is not required to also improve the EXISTING PARK area. The APPLICATION will qualify and score as ‘EXPAND an Existing PARK’ for this criterion.
  • If an EXPANSION is proposed to increase the PARK boundary, provide an explanation about the current use and ownership of the EXPANSION property.

RENOVATE EXISTING PARKS

  • The PROJECT must add or RENOVATE a RECREATION FEATURE. Examples of RECREATION FEATURES are listed below for Criteria 2 Technical Assistance.
  • If there is a combination of RENOVATION and NEW RECREATION FEATURES, make sure that the list is consistent with Criteria 2.

Criteria 2 - New Outdoor RECREATION FEATURES

  • PROJECTS that include 4 or more new Outdoor RECREATION FEATURES will score maximum points.
  • MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITIES are eligible but will not receive points for this criterion.

Examples of RECREATION FEATURES include but are not limited to the following:

  • Outdoor aquatic center, swimming pool, splash pad, pond, fishing pier, boat or paddling launch site
  • Amphitheater/performing arts dance, music, and theater stage
  • Athletic fields (soccer regulation or “futbol-rapido”, baseball, softball, football, archery etc.)
  • Athletic courts (basketball, “futsal”, tennis, pickleball, bocce ball, shuffleboard, badminton, horseshoe/cornhole, batting cages, etc.)
  • Community gardens, botanical, demonstration gardens, orchards, meditation/calm zone, pollinator/butterfly garden, labyrinth garden
  • Dog PARK
  • Golf course (disc, mini, etc.), equestrian course
  • Jogging and walking loop, par course, running track
  • Outdoor fitness area, obstacle course, ropes course, rock climbing wall, zip line
  • OPEN SPACE and natural area for public recreation use
  • Picnic/BBQ areas, game tables
  • Playground, tot lot, universally accessible, sensory/music play area, nature discovery zone, etc.
  • Plaza, zocalo, gazebo
  • Public art that is connected to the local culture/identity, that is interactive, integrated into the PARK's theme, and incorporated into the playscape
  • Skate PARK, skating rink, and BMX or pump track (non-motorized bike tracks), remote control track
  • Trail (non-motorized), pedestrian/bicycle bridge, greenbelt/linear PARK

MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITIES (eligible examples)

  • Restroom building, snack shack
  • Parking lot, staging area
  • Pathway for access to a RECREATION FEATURE or throughout the PARK
  • Landscaping or lighting that will be constructed throughout the PARK
  • Perimeter fencing around PARK

APPLICATIONS where the majority of the TOTAL PROJECT COST is for a MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITY will be less competitive. PROJECTS should create a NEW RECREATION OPPORTUNITY(S) as the primary goal.

Criteria 3 – Environmental DESIGN

If the PROJECT involves tree planting, provide an estimate of the number of trees to be planted and any other details regarding tree planting known at the time of APPLICATION. If the GRANT is awarded, GRANTEES may be required to report the following information about the PROJECTS before PROJECT COMPLETION:

  • Tree species
  • Size of trees at planting Information on the distance and direction to the nearest building (if applicable)
  • Information on the age and climate control of any nearby buildings (if applicable)
  • Information about the tree’s growing conditions

The following tools may be used to inform the responses to Criteria 3:

The response for landscaping may include how landscaping minimizes the use of toxic pesticides AND inorganic fertilizers.

Criteria 4 – STATEWIDE COMPREHENSIVE OUTDOOR RECREATION PLAN (SCORP)

Additional information about California’s 2021-2025 SCORP can be found at https://www.PARKsforcalifornia.org/scorp

Criteria 5 – Community Based Planning

5.A: MEETING Details

Review the “DESIGNING PARKS Using Community Based Planning” document for additional insights and guidance for PROJECT Selection Criteria #5 https://www.PARKsforcalifornia.org/planning_guide

Effective, highly used and safe PARKS are DESIGNED using significant community input. APPLICANTS are encouraged to partner with community based organizations that can help engage the RESIDENTS during the community-based planning MEETINGS.

The purpose of having MEETINGS is to promote a group dynamic, with participants building upon the ideas of one another. Engaging and interactive group discussions can lead to a more in-depth understanding of what the RESIDENTS need.

A survey may be used during the process as a tool, but by itself, a survey will not qualify as a MEETING.

See https://www.PARKsforcalifornia.org/planning_guide for past examples of creative MEETINGS use for PARK planning and DESIGN, such as:

  • Focus groups
  • DESIGN workshops
  • PARK DESIGN activities with students at the schools nearest to the PROJECT

MEETINGS that are outside of the DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY near the PROJECT SITE may be questioned for their convenience considering RESIDENTS who live in PROXIMITY. Schedule convenient locations and times for the RESIDENTS using cost effective approaches, such as:

  • MEETING locations preferably within walking distance for the RESIDENTS, such as “sidewalk MEETINGs” at the proposed PROJECT SITE. APPLICANTS or a partnering community group can set up a banner, easels, and tables on a Saturday morning and knock door-to-door inviting RESIDENTS to join neighbors and discuss PARK DESIGN ideas. In previous rounds, APPLICANTS reported that MEETINGS at the PROJECT SITE were exceptionally beneficial for the following: 1) participants gained a better sense of the PROJECT SITE and 2) attracted passersby to join.
  • In addition to MEETINGS at the PROJECT SITE, neighborhood/community based organizations and schools may let you use their MEETING space.
  • Have MEETINGS where RESIDENTS will already be present. For example, facilitate MEETINGS with students in their classes or add to the agendas of neighborhood/community based organization MEETINGS where RESIDENTS will be available. Use community festivals, cook-outs, and other events that attract RESIDENTS.
  • Schedule multiple MEETINGS to accommodate RESIDENTS with different employment and family schedules, including weekend or evening hours.

It is important that the response includes the start and end times for the Community Based Planning MEETINGS, and an explanation as to why the MEETING locations and times were convenient for RESIDENTS who live in PROXIMITY.

5.B - MEETING Outreach Methods

Inviting the RESIDENTS is an important factor for attendance. If they do not know about the MEETINGS, they will not come. Involving a BROAD REPRESENTATION of RESIDENTS to DESIGN the PARK ensures that it will meet the diverse needs of the community.

Different types of methods can be used to invite and encourage RESIDENTS to participate. Each of the following examples would count as one method:

  • Providing incentives to attend is a technique that agencies have used to increase turnout. Make the incentives clear in the invitations.
  • Partner with community leaders and organizations to assist with outreach.
  • Post flyers in high foot traffic areas such as bus stops, major intersections, stores, schools, community centers, and libraries. Provide invitations and MEETING materials in predominantly spoken languages in the community. If needed, have an interpreter present at MEETINGS.
  • Door-to-door in-person invitations.
  • Mail invitations that may include surveys (same language idea noted above).
  • Notices distributed at local schools.
  • Scheduling one or more MEETINGS where RESIDENTS will already be present counts as one method for inviting RESIDENTS.

The cumulative effect of the MEETINGS should result in a BROAD REPRESENTATION of RESIDENTS. For example, MEETING with youth at a school, older adults at a center, or parents at a PTA MEETING may not get you a BROAD REPRESENTATION in each MEETING, but when each MEETING is added with others, the combination does.

It is important to identify the number of RESIDENTS as well as age groups that participated in the combined set of MEETINGS. General descriptions are allowed such as “adults 55+”, “teens”, “pre-teens, 10-12”, “families with small children”, etc.

5.C - DESIGN Goals

Structure the MEETINGS following the minimum goals of Criteria 5(c). For suggestions regarding RECREATION FEATURE(S) selection and DESIGN ELEMENTS, see the Designing Parks Using Community Based Planning webpage.

Goal 1

  • Keep in mind that “not limited to a few predetermined options presented by the APPLICANT” means the RESIDENTS were given a blank slate as a starting point. Using easels or other means for the RESIDENTS to provide visuals (e.g. sketches) of their ideas is an effective way to enable the RESIDENTS to DESIGN the PARK. Encourage children to share ideas by providing them with pictures, stickers and art materials or other tools during MEETINGS. Previous APPLICANTS have reported that the best ideas came from children.

o   The response must describe the process for how RESIDENTS were enabled to “...identify, prioritize, and then select” RECREATION FEATURES.

  • Describe the process for how the MEETING was facilitated for detailed DESIGN ELEMENTS ideas for RECREATION FEATURES(s).
  • The list for the DESIGN ELEMENTS of the selected RECREATION FEATURES should represent detailed DESIGN ideas, such as theme, color, size, shape, and number.

o   Examples of different playground DESIGN ELEMENTS that enrich PARK use could be nature play, swings, rope climbing, or musical play equipment, etc.

o   Examples of DESIGN ELEMENTS for athletic courts and fields could include feedback from athletes and coaches on the type of surfacing, space, scoreboard, netting, fencing, lighting, sun orientation, and safety ideas.  For example, a full vs. half court, type of backboard and goal standards, including three point and other lines, and surfacing are examples of different court DESIGN ELEMENTS that can improve the experience.

Goal 2

Throughout community engagement ask questions and promote discussions that help RESIDENTS reveal themes of cultural significance and local identity.

  • Placemaking themes maybe related to local geography, natural features, climate, culture, historical resources, and ecology each contribute to the distinctive character of a community’s sense of place, comfort, and belonging.
  • How do PROJECT ELEMENTS Incorporate the distinctive character of a community and its unique contexts?
  • What PROJECT elements may symbolize hope or create a feeling of safety and familiarity to local RESIDENTS?
  • What creative ideas do local RESIDENTS have to create a sense of connection and place to the local community?

Public art may be used to rejuvenate public place and build strong vibrant communities.

  • A standalone new mural PROJECT, art piece, or sculpture (without local significance) may not score well.
  • Public art that is interactive and integrated into the PARK's theme and incorporated into the playscape, may score higher.

To help the RESIDENTS prioritize the selection of their preferred RECREATION FEATURE(S), make budget limitations and projections clear to RESIDENTS. The MEETINGS will take place before the APPLICATION is sent to OGALS. Make it clear to RESIDENTS that this program may be highly competitive, funding is not guaranteed and be prepared to discuss other options.

Criteria 6 – Partnerships

Do not include program operation and maintenance after PROJECT COMPLETION. Only list partnerships related to the PROJECT’s DESIGN (community based planning), PRE-CONSTRUCTION, land ACQUISITION, or CONSTRUCTION phase.

Partnerships need to be specific to the PROJECT by providing volunteer hours, or materials, or funding for DESIGN, PRE-CONSTRUCTION, land ACQUISITION, or CONSTRUCTION.

Criteria 7 – CEQA

To receive these 5 bonus points CEQA must be complete at time of application.

Criteria 8 – Community CHALLENGES and PROJECT Benefits

PROJECTS that will meet multiple needs of youth, older adults, and families will be more competitive than ones that provide a single use for a more limited group.

Resources that may help demonstrate community needs/CHALLENGES include:

You may also use other helpful metrics or data you’ve collected on a local level to demonstrate the unique CHALLENGES your community faces related to PARK access, recreation opportunities, health and safety, impacts from recent natural disasters, water and/or air quality issues, and other CHALLENGES as applicable.

Reference specific elements of your proposed PROJECT that will benefit the community and address the CHALLENGES outlined in your application.

We should be able to visualize how the community will be transformed if this PROJECT is funded.

 

 

ELIGIBLE COSTS Chart

This section provides rules and examples of ELIGIBLE COSTS for ACQUISITION and DEVELOPMENT.

Purchase price of the property and relocation costs

(Note: LWCF will not reimburse incidental costs related to ACQUISITION) These incidental costs include preliminary title reports, appraisal fees, escrow costs, and title insurance fees – all are ineligible).

  • Cost of the land, as established by the UASFLA Appraisal
  • Relocation costs (Costs resulting in displacement of tenants (not willing sellers or GRANTEES) pursuant to Government Code §7260 – 7277).

o   If the GRANT is not paying for relocation costs, the GRANTEE must ensure that the seller is paying displaced tenants in compliance with Government Code §7260 – 7277.

  • Employee services (See accounting rules for employee services explained in the GRANT ADMINISTRATION GUIDE).
  • PROJECT/GRANT administration and accounting

DEVELOPMENT Costs

The following list provides examples of ELIGIBLE COSTS for PRE-AWARD PLANNING COSTS and CONSTRUCTION COSTS.

PRE-AWARD COSTS

  • Public MEETINGs, focus groups, and DESIGN workshop costs
  • Plans, specifications, construction documents, and cost estimates
  • Permits
  • POST-SELECTION FEDERAL REQUIREMENTSsuch asCEQA, NEPA, A&R Form, and SECTION 106
  • Bid packages
  • Employee services:See accounting rules for employee services explained in the GRANT ADMINISTRATION GUIDE
  • PROJECT/GRANT administration (excluding GRANT writing)

CONSTRUCTION COSTS

  • Site preparation, grading, gutting, clearing and grubbing, and demolition
  • Foundation work
  • Purchase and installation of permanent equipment: Playground equipment, benches, signs, display boards, etc.
  • Construction supplies and materials: May be drawn from central stock if claimed costs are no higher than supplies or materials purchased elsewhere
  • Construction equipment owned by GRANTEE: Equipment owned by the GRANTEE may be charged to the GRANT for each use. For audit purposes, a report or source document must describe the work performed, indicate the hours used, relate the use to the GRANT SCOPE, and must be signed by the operator or supervisor.
  • Construction equipment rented or purchased by GRANTEE: For purchased equipment, GRANT will pay for the total cost, if the purchase price is less than the rental equivalent (i.e., rental price equivalent in proportion to the time the equipment is used on the GRANT SCOPE).
  • Construction management, including site inspections.
  • Employee services: See accounting rules for employee services explained in the GRANT ADMINISTRATION GUIDE.
  • Payment of premiums on hazard and liability insurance to cover personnel and property directly connected with the PROJECT.
  • PROJECT/GRANT administration and accounting.
  • Miscellaneous costs: Other costs incurred during the construction phase, such as transporting materials, equipment, personnel, and communication

 

Ineligible Costs

  • Outside the GRANT PERFORMANCE PERIOD – costs incurred before or after the GRANT PERFORMANCE PERIOD. The exception is only when PRE-AWARD PLANNING COSTS are identified on the PRE-AWARD PLANNING COSTS Form and approved by NPS.
  • Overhead business expenses of the GRANTEE’S fixed or ordinary operating costs: (rent, mortgage payments, property taxes, utilities, office supplies).
  • Outside PARK/PROJECT SITE boundaries – Street improvements, traffic lights, or other infrastructure not located within the PARK/PROJECT SITE.
  • Incidental costs relating to ACQUISITION of real property and of interests in real property, unless allowable under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Policies Act, P.L. 91­ 646. These incidental costs include preliminary title reports, appraisal fees, escrow costs, and title insurance fees – all not eligible.
  • Construction bonding/insurance
  • Security cameras, sound systems, televisions, video equipment, and EV charging stations.
  • Facilities on public school grounds.
  • Indoor facilities that support primarily non-outdoor purposes, such as destination restaurants, community centers, indoor recreation centers, educational centers, or employee housing.
  • Outdoor facilities that support non-recreation purposes such as outdoor classrooms, food truck areas, or farmer’s market areas. 
  • Remediation work related to reversing or stopping environmental damage. 
  • Costs for preservation or restoration of a historic resource, unless for typical repair work on a facility that will be used as part of the PARK such as a historic pedestrian bridge or gazebo. 
  • Stormwater management facilities, unless serving the PARK itself. 
  • Contractor bonding and insurance  
  • Non-fixed facilities and sports/play equipment such as temporary bleachers, moveable goal posts, balls, bats, rackets, pool toys, etc. 
  • Fundraising
  • Food
  • GRANT Writing
  • Programming costs
  • Brochures
  • Operation and maintenance costs

Definitions

Capitalized words and terms used in this procedural guide are defined below.

ACQUISITION – to obtain fee title of real property or a permanent easement, which gives rights for the GRANTEE to use the property as a public PARK and prioritize outdoor recreation access in PERPETUITY. A lease or rental is not considered ACQUISITION.

APPLICANT – an entity requesting GRANT funding through a COMPETITIVE process.

BROAD REPRESENTATION – inclusion of DESIGN ideas from RESIDENTS that may have different recreational needs, including youth, older adults, and families. Inclusion of people with disabilities, single adults, and immigrants are also encouraged. Sole involvement of an advocacy group or league likely to promote a specific RECREATION FEATURE does not meet this intent.

CEQA – the California Environmental Quality Act as stated in the Public Resources Code §21000 et seq.; Title 14 California Code of Regulations §15000 et seq. CEQA is a law establishing policies and procedures that require entities to identify, disclose to decision makers and the public, and attempt to lessen significant impacts to environmental and historical resources that may occur as a result of the entities’ proposed PROJECT. For more information see https://opr.ca.gov/CEQA.

CHALLENGES – conditions present in a community affecting the HEALTH and quality of life for youth, older adults, and families. Examples include a lack of safe and affordable recreational opportunities, poverty, community health and safety, resilience to natural disasters, avoidance of legacy pollution, or access to clean water and air.

COMMITTED FUNDS – at the time when the APPLICATION is sent to OGALS, the APPLICANT has possession of all funds for the TOTAL PROJECT COST (MATCH and the funding source to be reimbursed by the LWCF GRANT) that will be spent on the PROJECT or has a CONTRACT or other binding agreement with another entity(s) OBLIGATING funds that will be spent on the PROJECT. Funds that are not in the APPLICANT’S possession or not OBLIGATED through a binding agreement are not COMMITTED FUNDS.

CONTRACT – an agreement between OGALS and the GRANTEE specifying the achievement of the GRANT SCOPE within the GRANT PERFORMANCE PERIOD, and other GRANT obligations between the GRANTEE and OGALS.

DESIGN – preliminary PROJECT concepts and drawings achieved through the community based planning MEETINGS, before the completion of engineer/construction documents.

DESIGN ELEMENTS - detailed DESIGN ideas, for the function and appearance of a RECREATION FEATURE or MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITY. These can include, but are not limited to, theme, color, size, layout, shape, material, or other structural enhancements, specific to the proposed RECREATION FEATURE or MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITY.

DEVELOPMENT – to construct a NEW RECREATION FEATURE(S) or MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITY. RENOVATION of an existing RECREATION FEATURE or MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITY is also considered DEVELOPMENT.

DISADVATAGED COMMUNITY – a designated census tract that is identified by the CEJST Tool, EJScreen, Statewide Parks Program Community FactFinder, or Eligibility Requirement #3C as being disadvantaged. 

DPR—the California Department of Parks and Recreation, which includes OGALS, is the lead entity for administering LWCF in California.

ELIGIBLE COSTS – PRE-AWARD PLANNING COSTS and expenses incurred during the GRANT PERFORMANCE PERIOD to complete the GRANT SCOPE approved by OGALS through a fully executed CONTRACT. Costs of MINOR SUPPORT AMENITIES are combined with costs associated with RECREATION FEATURES and MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITIES.

EXPAND – the PROJECT will add NEW PARK acreage adjacent to an existing PARK.

GRANT – amount of LWCF funds made available to a GRANTEE for completion of the GRANT SCOPE during the GRANT PERFORMANCE PERIOD.

GRANTEE – an entity that has a CONTRACT with the OGALS for a GRANT.

GRANT ADMINISTRATION GUIDE – a document that provides requirements and forms for GRANT administration after an APPLICANT becomes a GRANTEE. The document can be found at LWCF GRANT ADMINISTRATION GUIDE.

GRANT PERFORMANCE PERIOD – the period of time shown on the CONTRACT starting with the date NPS OBLIGATES the funds for the PROJECT, during which ELIGIBLE COSTS may be incurred by the GRANTEE and charged to the GRANT. Up to five years for DEVELOPMENT or up to three years for ACQUISITION.

GRANT SCOPE – the RECREATION FEATURES and MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITIES proposed through the PROJECT. These must be completed prior to final GRANT payment.

JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY (JPA) – an agreement between a city, county, and/or a district to perform services, cooperate with, or lend powers for the operation and maintenance of PARK land. For a JPA to be an eligible APPLICANT for the LOCAL AGENCY COMPETITIVE PROGRAM, at least one member of the JPA must be a LOCAL AGENCY and all members must be public agencies.

LWCF – Land and Water Conservation Fund GRANT program.

LWCF BOUNDARY MAP – a tool used as communication between NPS, OGALS, and GRANTEES that:

  • Shows the agreed boundaries of the protected PARK site at the time of PROJECT approval pursuant to 54 U.S.C. §200305(f)(3) of the LWCF Act and Title 36, Part 59 in the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations.
  • Shows key information about the site, including any other rights and interests present.
  • Helps with site inspections for compliance with POST-COMPLETION PARK STEWARDSHIP STANDARDS.

When an LWCF PROJECT is completed, the land within the approved LWCF BOUNDARY MAP is placed under federal protection to preserve the public’s outdoor recreational use of the site in PERPETUITY.

LWCF PROTECTION – the area within the PROJECT SITE boundary must remain designated for outdoor public recreation use in PERPETUITY.

MATCH – amount required to make up the difference between the LWCF GRANT amount requested (the federal share) and the TOTAL PROJECT COST. The GRANTEE must cash-flow both the LWCF GRANT amount and MATCH, covering the TOTAL PROJECT COST established at the time of APPLICATION, to be reimbursed the full LWCF GRANT amount.

MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITY – a non-recreational facility located within a PROJECT SITE and necessary to support the outdoor recreation use of the PARK. Examples include parking lots, restroom buildings, lighting, landscaping, and maintenance buildings.

MEETING – RESIDENTS worked together as a group in person with the APPLICANT or with the APPLICANT’S partnering community based organization(s) to DESIGN the PARK. The type of MEETING can be creative, cost effective, and non-traditional. Formal public hearings are not required.

NEPA – the National Environmental Policy Act. Each federal agency including NPS has its own unique NEPA process and pathways. More information is available at NPS’ NEPA Policy website: https://www.NPS.gov/subjects/NEPA/policy.htm.

NEW PARK – a PARK that did not exist before the APPLICATION deadline.

NEW RECREATION FEATURE – construction of a NEW RECREATION FEATURE where none currently exists, or substantial RENOVATION of an existing RECREATION FEATURE to allow for new and EXPANDED use(s).

NPS – National PARK Service, federal agency that oversees LWCF.

OBLIGATE – when NPS approves a PROJECT and enters into a funding agreement with OGALS to designate the GRANT funds for the PROJECT.

OGALS – the Office of Grants and Local Services, under DPR, responsible for administering LWCF and ORLP.

OPEN SPACE – a natural or landscaped portion of the PROJECT DESIGNED specifically for active or passive outdoor recreation.

ORLP -  Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership GRANT program. ORLP is a nationally competitive program targeting GRANT assistance to help economically disadvantaged urban communities.

PARK – public land that provides outdoor active or passive opportunities with RECREATION FEATURES for physical activities, social health, cultural enrichment, and nature appreciation.

PERPETUITY – the required POST-COMPLETION PARK STEWARDSHIP REQUIREMENTS of land to continue for all future generations within an LWCF BOUNDARY MAP approved by NPS.

PRE-AWARD PLANNING COSTS – ELIGIBLE COSTS incurred up to three years prior to NPS’ PROJECT approval. Examples include site selection and planning, feasibility studies, CEQA/NEPA environmental review, SECTION 106, the Application and Revision Form, preliminary DESIGN, preparation of cost estimates, and construction drawings and specifications.

POST-COMPLETION PARK STEWARDSHIP REQUIREMENTS – additional information on NPS’ operation and maintenance requirements in PERPETUITY for GRANTEES, found at www.PARKS.ca.gov/LWCF.

POST-SELECTION FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS – documents and processes required by NPS prior to their federal PROJECT review and approval, including SECTION 106, NEPA, and other required federal forms. LOCAL AGENCIES will move forward with these requirements after the COMPETITIVE program review and selection. STATE AGENCIES will move forward immediately with these requirements following their APPLICATION deadline.

PROJECT – the RECREATION FEATURES and MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITIES to be developed through the GRANT.

PROJECT COMPLETION – when the RECREATION FEATURES and MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITIES proposed through the PROJECT are complete and the facilities are open and useable by the public. With approval by OGALS, PROJECT COMPLETION may occur before the facilities are open and useable by the public.

PROJECT OFFICER – an OGALS employee in the National Park Service Grants Unit who acts as a GRANT APPLICATION contact for APPLICANTS or an administration contact for GRANTEES.

PROJECT SITE – the entire PARK property.

RECREATION FEATURE – a facility that provides active or passive recreational use. The ACQUISITION of land is also considered a RECREATION FEATURE.

RENOVATION – improvements to an existing RECREATION FEATURE beyond its original condition so that it creates a NEW RECREATION FEATURE and EXPANDED use.

RESIDENTS – the population living primarily within a half mile of the PROJECT SITE including youth, families, and older adults.

SECTION 106 – a law codified at 54 U.S.C. § 306108, with implementing regulation set forth in 36 CFR Part 800, that requires federal agencies to consider the effects on historic properties (i.e., archaeological, tribal, and built environment cultural resources that are listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places) for federally funded or permitted PROJECTS or for PROJECTS proposed on federal land.

STATEWIDE COMPREHENSIVE OUTDOOR RECREATION PLAN (SCORP) – an analysis and report updated every five years as required by LWCF to identify California’s public outdoor recreation needs and priorities. The most recent SCORP can be found at https://www.PARKSforcalifornia.org/scorp/.

TOTAL PROJECT COST – the estimated cost at the time of APPLICATION to complete the PROJECT, including both the LWCF GRANT plus MATCH.

UNIFORM APPRAISAL STANDARDS FOR FEDERAL LAND ACQUISITIONS (UASFLA) – appraisal standards (also known as the “Yellow Book” standards) required for federal land ACQUISITION. Compliance with UASFLA differs from the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). For more information on the specific UASFLA policies and guidance for LWCF appraisals, see the NPS LWCF MANUAL.

 

Go back to ORLP's informational page